Difficult enquiries

The photograph on the phone, and the hair in the chair

A client sends a photograph and asks "can you do this?" It is the most common enquiry in the industry and the most dangerous to answer quickly, because the honest reply depends on hair the salon has not seen and the photograph itself is usually not what it appears to be - different base colour, extensions, a filter, or three previous appointments that are not in the frame.

A photograph is a request, not a specification

What the client is showing is the outcome they want to feel, not a technical instruction. The photograph does not say what the person's natural colour is, what has already been put on it, how much length there is to work with, or how many sittings the model in the picture had. Treating it as a brief is how a salon ends up defending a result that matches the photograph and not the person.

Say what is missing from the frame

The useful early message names the variables rather than hedging: we need to know your current colour and what has been on it, whether that photograph has extensions in it, and how your hair behaves. Clients are not offended by this - they usually have no idea the picture is ambiguous, and being told what the colourist actually needs reads as expertise rather than as an obstacle.

The gap is cheaper to name now than to discover later

If reaching that photograph takes three appointments, or is not achievable on this hair at all, the moment to say so is before the booking. It loses some appointments and it prevents the specific disaster that costs a salon a client and a review: the person who sat for four hours expecting something else. A salon willing to say "not in one visit" in writing is trusted differently.

What software may do with a photograph, and what it may not

It may receive it, attach it to the enquiry, ask the two or three questions a colourist would want alongside it, and route it to the right person with the right time allowed. It may not assess it. An automated "yes, we can achieve that" is a promise about hair nobody has touched, and it will be read as one.

Frequently asked questions

Can the assistant say whether a photo is achievable?
No, and the refusal is worth phrasing well because the client is asking in good faith. Explain that a colourist needs to know the current colour and history, offer the consultation, and say what that consultation will tell them. Declining to judge the photograph while explaining why is more persuasive than a confident answer that has to be walked back.
What should we ask when a photo arrives?
Three things: what is on your hair now including any home colour, when it was last done, and whether you are happy for it to take more than one appointment. Those answers decide the time to allow and who should take the booking, which is most of what the salon needs before the day.
Clients often send photographs that are filtered or edited. How do we raise that?
As a fact about photographs, never as a correction of the client. Screens and filters change colour, and most people know this when it is mentioned neutrally. Ask for a second picture in daylight and the conversation becomes practical instead of uncomfortable.
Should the photo be attached to the booking?
Yes, and it is one of the simplest improvements a salon can make. A stylist who sees the reference before the client sits down has already decided the approach and the timing. A photograph that lives only in a chat nobody reopens is a wasted piece of information the client took the trouble to send.
Is there a privacy question about keeping client photos?
There is, and it deserves one published sentence rather than silence: what the salon keeps, for how long, who can see it, and that nothing is published without being asked. Clients send pictures of themselves freely and still notice when a salon has never said what happens to them.

Get in touch

Leave your details and we will reply. You do not need a sales call to get an answer.